Lifetime, MPG, room, trunk space, power

none

I had a 1999 Civic that had over 170,000 miles on it. It ran great around town but had trouble with the big hills that's why I decided to get a new car. While shopping I had to decided on a few different cars but in the end the Civic was the best choice for me. I bought a Blue 4 door Civic brand new. It has been a great car! I get around 27 mpg in the city an close to 35 on the highway. It accomodates myself (thin 5 foot something frame) and also my fiance (a larger 6 foot something frame) with ease. The seat pumps up and down and the steering wheel telescopes out. Both features make it easy for anyone to drive. I highly recommend the Civic to anyone. It is a reliable car that will run forever (like my 99 170,000 mile baby!) They are very affordable and extremely safe with one of the highest saftey ratings of any car in it's class. They are great cars!

Similar Products Used:

1999 Honda Civic

Gas mileage. After 75,000 miles, my average MPG is 39.5. Minimal repair work.

None.

An outstanding commuter car. Also wonderful on trips. My greatest MPH was 47.3, my worst 32. It is comfortable to drive, handles better than you would expect a small lightweight car like this to do. Overall, it is the best commuter car I have ever owned.

Similar Products Used:

Various Ford and GM products.

The Civic’s that are made in Canada has very poor fit and finish. The hood on the left and right fender would not be even, other panels on the car would be off on each side and also the bumper in the back. If they can't even make that right, just imagine the engine and the transmission components. “Honda owner check your civics and you would be able to tell the difference on the body panels are not even on the right and left sides of the car”. I asked the dealer sales people and their replied “they don’t know why”.


However the civic hybrids are made very well, those are made in Japan.

Reliability, fit and finish. Engine power has dramatically improved.

Let room on the driver side is a little narrow. E-Brake sticks into drivers leg. Other than that not too much in the short-comings.

This is a outstanding car. Fit and finish are exacting and flawless. Judging from 3 previous Honda reliability is incredible. I won't hesitate to recommend Honda to anyone.

Similar Products Used:

Toyota Corolla

quality, reliability, engine

with the similar to Integra R engine this car really flies. In ordinary use there is no problem, no high consumption no effort. As ordinary civic - its build qualoity make it all taotally effortless. But if your feet points throttle around 5000-8300 rpm there is wild storm going on. This strom is so torrential that even much (apparently) stronger 3.0 or 2.0 engines could feel seriously threatened :)

Fun, motor, handling, standard equipment, stereo, resale value

3rd gear

Civic Si feels separate and different from the base model as soon as you open the door. Purists might bemoan the retreat of the hatchback Civic Si from American shores, but the new four-door Si's supportive and low-slung sports seats, stumpy alloy shifter and pedals positioned perfectly for heel-and-toe downshifts do their part to confirm that the spirit of the old Si remains intact, regardless of the door count.

A big part of that spirit, as with every fast Honda since the 1988 Prelude 2.0 Si, is tucked under the hood. Here the new Si doesn't disappoint. Within a whisker of 100 horsepower per liter, the Si's high-compression 2.0 liter twincam four pumps out 197 horsepower at a giddy 7,800 rpm. Also true to Honda form it makes a rather less exclamation point-worthy 139 lb-ft of torque.

The car tested wore more black than Johnny Cash. The seats are black, the carpet is black, the door panels are black, etc. Only the sporty red stitching on the seats and well-judged use of alloy-effect plastic on the console and steering wheel saved the car's interior from looking like the lost-and-found bin at a Cannibal Corpse concert.

Honda wisely chose to fit the Si with electrically-assisted power steering as opposed to hydraulic steering found in the rest of the Civic lineup. The result is a sharper feel at the helm, seeming at once more delicate and more mechanical. Feedback from the road is good, but not outstanding. Sadly, Honda's days of unassisted, feel-every-pebble steering seem to have died with the NSX, but the Si's steering is still about as good as it gets in this price range.

The Si is fitted with a limited slip differential, but you wouldn't know it at parking lot speeds, where there's wheelspin aplenty. At higher speeds the 'diff makes its presence known, divvying up traction between the front wheels to punt the car out of corners with a minimum of wheelspin, but it doesn't emulate the more uncompromising Honda Integra Type-R's (available only to the European and Asian market) wonder differental, which is reputed to give an almost rear-drive feel.

The Si gets a red-tinted tachometer as opposed to the standard Civic's more peaceful blue one, and the separate digital speedometer stacked on top of the 'tach in a housing just under the windscreen is shared by both. Shuffling your gaze up and down between the tach and speedo, rather than side to side to make sure neither socially sensible revs nor Conway traffic laws are breached takes some getting used to; and mighty tempting it is to venture into the naughty side of both.

A twist of the key is all it takes to know Honda put some of their best and brightest to task on the Si engine. A trait of most high-compression engines (11.0 to 1 for the Si, the same as a Lamborghini Murcielago LP640(!)), the cylinders make high-pitched chirping sounds as the starter motor stirs the engine before it bursts into life with a surprisingly bass-rich burble. The as-standard sports exhaust system makes about as good a noise as you're going to get with an inline four, at once cultured and exuberant.

Low revs aren't the Si's fort. Compared to, say, the Scion tC or Cobalt SS SC, the engine feels downright anemic below 2,000 rpm. But Honda's engineers have been working for almost two decades to perfect a hole card that trumps the tC's Camry-sourced 2.3 liter and Nissan's 2.5 liter, and almost matches the Cobalt SS SC's supercharged 2.2 in outright power output: i-VTEC. Explaining just how VTEC works is one of those long-winded gearhead diatribes that sends even the most patient listeners running for the hills. Suffice to say it's a mechanism by which the camshafts shift slightly at a certain RPM (6,000 in the Si's case, give or take a few hundred revs) to allow the engine to breathe in as much fuel and air as is physically possible.

It's the same basic principal as the old "cammer" engines of muscle car lore. Dragstrip aficionados will know the rough, uneven idle of Detroit big iron tuned to sing like Pavarotti down the strip, but so highly-strung they're barely able to keep ticking over at anything under 1,000 rpm.

i-VTEC is the best of both worlds. With the camshafts spun back to their normal low-rev, around-town configuration the Si is a grocery getter, getting 31 miles to the gallon. Above 6,000 rpm it's a racer, and fuel consumption concerns fly right out the window. If the engine pulls a Jekyll and Hyde from idle to 6,000 rpm, it's a full-on Dracula from 6,000 to the 8,000 rpm redline.

There's a noticeable kick in the back as the needle passes six grand, almost like the second stage of an old four-barrel carburetor coming on-line, accompanied by a sudden hardening of the exhaust note and induction whine. Keep the revs below the VTEC camshaft shift point and it's an economy car. Pass it and it's full speed ahead and damn the ice caps. Making an engine spin faster, to refute the oft-repeated racetrack mantra, is one of several replacements for displacement.

You can ask

Motor, looks, handling

DBW and body seams

Awesome car for balls out driving. Lots of bad things as well. The worst is a lack of throttle response from 2 -7 mph. Yes, that's right, if you are in neutral or in gear but have the clutch depressed, then rev the engine between 2 and 7 mph, you will not have any throttle response. It's so bad that if you were at a yield sign, coasting through, then realized you needed to get on the throttle because a car is about to slam you, the lack of throttle response causes an unsure moment as to whether or not your car will get out of the way in time. It's that bad. The Si I road tested before buying mine had the same problem, though at the time I didn't realize what it was and that it was a serious, ongoing issue. Another issue is the severe hesitation when cold, and even when warm, though to a lesser degree. I mean severe! My '94 Accord with 260,000 miles has an engine that is silky smooth, even when cold. Now we're in 2007 and can't have a vehicle that runs smooth when cold? Honda really messed up with their Drive By Wire ( DBW ) and computer programming. Another issue is the tire hop when, god forbid, it's even a little wet out. The hop is so bad that it jars the heck out of the car. Not something that I would expect from a limited slip differential, not to mention the suspension setup. Another bad thing? The quality of the body panel seams. Each and every one of the seams on the body are off. Either more space than another, or a panel may be actually sticking out further than the panel that is next to it. The battery struggles to turn the motor over as well. Always feels like it's struggling when cranking. When cold, the fast idle gets confused and will "catch" and go from 1750 to 2250 after a quick blip of the throttle. Oh yes, I don't want to forget the problem with shifting into 3rd gear. When cold, and if shifting without force, 3rd gear will always pop out and put you in neutral. Love it!

If it weren't so sexy, I'd drive it off a bridge while hitting 8000 rpm. Then I'd get insurance money to buy a car that has body panels that match and a throttle system that is not electronic. That would mean, I dare say, that it wouldn't be a Honda. Sorry Honda, your DBW sucks and your reluctance to address and fix these issues are your downfall in my eyes.

Similar Products Used:

Lots of Honda vehicles for over 20 years

Motor, handling, looks

DBW - all aspects of it; body seams. Honda needs to fix the lack of throttle response from 2-7 mph before I or anyone else sues them after getting into an accident.

Awesome car for balls out driving. Lots of bad things as well. The worst is a lack of throttle response from 2 -7 mph. Yes, that's right, if you are in neutral or in gear but have the clutch depressed, then rev the engine between 2 and 7 mph, you will not have any throttle response. It's so bad that if you were at a yield sign, coasting through, then realized you needed to get on the throttle because a car is about to slam you, the lack of throttle response causes an unsure moment as to whether or not your car will get out of the way in time. It's that bad. The Si I road tested before buying mine had the same problem, though at the time I didn't realize what it was and that it was a serious, ongoing issue. Another issue is the severe hesitation when cold, and even when warm, though to a lesser degree. I mean severe! My '94 Accord with 260,000 miles has an engine that is silky smooth, even when cold. Now we're in 2007 and can't have a vehicle that runs smooth when cold? Honda really messed up with their Drive By Wire ( DBW ) and computer programming. Another issue is the tire hop when, god forbid, it's even a little wet out. The hop is so bad that it jars the heck out of the car. Not something that I would expect from a limited slip differential, not to mention the suspension setup. Another bad thing? The quality of the body panel seams. Each and every one of the seams on the body are off. Either more space than another, or a panel may be actually sticking out further than the panel that is next to it. The battery struggles to turn the motor over as well. Always feels like it's struggling when cranking. When cold, the fast idle gets confused and will "catch" and go from 1750 to 2250 after a quick blip of the throttle.

If it weren't so sexy, I'd drive it off a bridge while hitting 8000 rpm. Then I'd get insurance money to buy a car that has body panels that match and a throttle system that is not electronic. That would mean, I dare say, that it wouldn't be a Honda. Sorry Honda, your DBW sucks and your reluctance to address and fix these issues are your downfall in my eyes.

Toyota anyone?

Similar Products Used:

1985 CRX Si
1989 CRX Si
1990 Accord DX
1994 Accord EX
2005 Civic DX

Design and workmanship, love the digital speedo and tachometer set up. Great gas mileage and very comfortable over long distances with no body fatigue. Fun to drive and very peppy.

Factory installed tires. Make sure if you live in area with snow that you get snow tires installed or have fun keeping control of car.

I bought this car in November 2006. I had a 2004 Civic and traded it in because I liked the new technology in the 2007. I have put on just over 30,000km in the first year and have had absolutely no problems! This car is fun to drive...just ask my 21 year old son!!! It has lots of horsepower and the 5 speed manaul transmission is great. I am about to purchas a 2008 for my wife. I am sold on these cars. Typical Honda workmanship. The only knock I have on this car is the factory installed tires. It has the Goodyear RS tires and they are absolutely useless in the winter. I agree with some other writers that without winter tires the backend of the car is very loose.

Similar Products Used:

2204 Honda Civic

Great price, easy to drive, reasonable maintenance costs, VERY RELIABLE, good gas mileage, high resale value (you won't ever be "upside down" in your payments

Backseat is small for adults, but this is a compact economy car, after all. High resale value makes it more cost effective to purchase new than even considering a 4 year old Civic (okay, that's actually a plus for Honda owners).

This is my second Civic. We still own and drive my 1995 Civic LX with 182,000 miles on it. We bought our 2004 Civic brand new and it has lived up to all our expectations.

I love Civics because they can be sporty (coupe) or conventional (sedan) and anyone of any age can find a color/style combination to fit their taste and budget.

Our friends make fun of us for always driving compact economy cars, but I drive about 80 miles round trip (highway) per day to work and my Civic gets about 33 MPG. I fill up once, maybe twice a week. We still drive the '95 Civic 54 miles/day for my husbands commute.

The Civic is reliable and I've found maintenance to be very reasonable. I have about 63,000 miles on the '04 and my only "major" repairs thus far were brakes and tires. I had no problem with the factory tires... they lasted me about 60k miles.

I keep my car very clean and usually I ride solo with the windows up at about 65-75 mph. I have plenty of room in the driver's seat (I'm an average sized woman) and I feel safe and comfortable. I have no idea what people are talking about with road noise and I think I would know, since I drive my car at least 500 miles/week. We don't own a full-sized car or an SUV, so we sometimes fold down the rear seats to carry larger items and it works fine for us.

I only had one in-warranty repair: The dealer had to replace my rear windshield because the defroster was interfering with my antenna. I also want to point out that my friend's Toyota Solara had the same exact problem.

It costs money to maintain your car. If you follow the scheduled maintenance on your Honda, it could last you 200k+ miles.

Similar Products Used:

1995 Honda Civic LX (still own), 1991 Honda Accord LX