Ford Explorer (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
Ford Explorer (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
|
[Jul 19, 2000]
Janet McGehee
Model Reviewed:
limited
Strength:
looks, style, weight, real snappy suv
Weakness:
wind noise--previous brake problem-- I trade my suv, usually every 1 1/2 to 2 yrs, but this one may make the 2 yr limit--drives great, computer controls, cd, cassette, front & rear Similar Products Used: loved my first blazer--not so on the next one--first explorer i hated |
|
[Jul 21, 2000]
Peter
Model Reviewed:
Explorer XLT 4.0 6cyl 4 door
Strength:
Cargo Space; Styling at the time (now styling looks old); Powerful optional larger V6;
Weakness:
Poor Quality (expect many trips to dealer), cabin squeeks, poor directional signal switch (always turns off way before you turn); dealers are low class vs Toyota and Honda; no back seat room; several power window and door lock motors went bad starting from the first month; VERY uncomfortable seat belts that seem to be designed to keep getting tighter and tighter as you drive; Poor resale value; Traction marginal for a 4x4 (standard tires are not effective); I would recommend you buy anything else (except maybe GM) instead of Ford. They just can't design and build a quality vehicle as well as other manufacturers (they do beat GM, but that's easy). Now that my warranty is up, I will probably sell it. Similar Products Used: No other SUV. |
|
[Jul 16, 2000]
Andrew B.
Model Reviewed:
XLS 4DR 4x4
Strength:
Plenty of interior room, reliable 4x4 system, good overall reliability, great price compared to competing SUV's.
Weakness:
Fuel economy (but you shouldn't expect anything more from an SUV), soft suspension, wind/road noise increases as vehicle gets older. Bought my Explorer new in Feb 1996. Have just passed 115K kms (71K miles) and have only had to do regular maintenance. This is no pavement princess either as I regularily off-road with it and do lots of camping and skiing. Transmission is starting to show signs of wear, and will likely require a rebuild before the year is up. Dealer also recommends replacing stock shocks. Other than that a very reliable and practical vehicle. I have improved several areas with cheap performance improvements. More ground clearance with modest lift and larger 31" tires, more performance and fuel economy with aftermarket plug wires, plugs, synthetic fluids throughout, KKM intake kit and Borla stainless cat-back exhaust. All items could be considered as regularly scheduled maintenance parts improvements. Similar Products Used: 1st SUV |
|
[Jul 02, 2000]
David
Model Reviewed:
Explorer XLT AWD V-8
Strength:
Comfey seats.
Weakness:
Ride quality. Paid 28,560 for V-8,overhead console,Cloth Captains seats,and etc. Similar Products Used: First SUV |
|
[Jul 08, 2000]
Clyde Deschamp
Strength:
Easy to drive. Good view of the road. Ease of use of rear door. Good A/C.
Weakness:
Rough ride. Noisy. Not quite wide enough to load and haul 4 x 8 materials without a struggle. Sound system. One of the better smaller SUVs on the market. Good value for the money. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jun 24, 2000]
Karl Ferron
Model Reviewed:
Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
Strength:
Quiet ride, dependable.
Weakness:
Suspension Purchased used almost 3 years ago, at auction for $21,000. (Dealerships were trying to charge me $25,000-28,000 for ones I saw on their lots). It's black with the tan accent, grey leather, sunroof, upgraded stereo system (without the CD player), and 4-liter, 6 cyl engine. Nice thing to drive, especially in rain or snow, or in the heat of day. Fuel econ has been 17 on avg, and I can get around 23-24 mpg on flat hwy (keep your speed down). Sometimes I kick in the 4WD auto when the road surface is wet, just to keep the rear wheels from slipping too much. That, I think is the fault of its stock wheels, which I will replace the late part of this year. I've never been impressed with them, the Goodyears you see on most Ford Explorers. Similar Products Used: n/a |
|
[Jun 25, 2000]
Brandon Katcher
Strength:
not too much. Nice Interior. There are stereo controls in the back.
Weakness:
reliability, gas, stereo, looks, ability to stay upright We have had a lot of problems with the Ford. The battery has literally exploded twice. Once it popped the hood off. The Stereo system is broken, along with the CD changer. It drives more like a truck then an SUV. You can feel all the bumps in the road a lot more then in our Jeep Grand Cherokee. The back right window is broken. The gas mileage isn't good, but that's what you get when you get an SUV. Also, the ford does not feel safe when turning. And it's just plain ugly too. Similar Products Used: Jeep Grand Cherokee (much better SUV) |
|
[Jun 27, 2000]
Todd Christ
Model Reviewed:
Explorer XLT
Strength:
nice powerband (205HP Model), pretty roomy for 4+ adults and can pack a TON of stuff in the back
Weakness:
squeaky brakes and bearings (i think there was a recall for that) Was rented for several months (work related), was my choice every time I needed a good solid vehicle for transportation/snow, etc... Similar Products Used: none |
|
[Jun 14, 2000]
Jacob
Strength:
It does drive fairly well, and can accelerate well.
Weakness:
I was in a roll-over accident with it. I was in a solo roll-over accident with my aunt, her husband, and her 5 year old son. Her husband is in critical condition (he wasn't wearing a seat belt). The worst part was my cousin's seat belt came unbuckled when the car rolled. This car cannot turn well without rolling over. I will never drive an SUV after this incident. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jun 16, 2000]
Thomas Cardinal
Model Reviewed:
Ford Explorer
Strength:
Horsepower,easy to drive,comfortable interior,smooth ride,lots of cargo space.
Weakness:
Four trips to Ford dealer for various recalls. Defective cd player/radio in dash. Expensive,computer chip keys to make back ups. Low miles per gallon of gas. Needs big garage. $32,000 off the lot price. Recommended to all. Similar Products Used: n/a |


