Subaru Outback SUV | Crossover
Subaru Outback SUV | Crossover
USER REVIEWS
[Aug 14, 2001]
Will
Model Reviewed:
Subaru Outback
Strength:
See above
Weakness:
See above The Outback for the first six months was a great car, then we started to have transmission problems. The transmission started to go "psycho", at times; it would miss shifts, skip gears and even (at highway speeds) downshift from overdrive (at 65 mph) into second gear causing the vehicle to deaccelerate to 45 (almost causing my wife and myself to be rear-ended). Similar Products Used: See above |
[Jul 24, 2001]
Gary
Model Reviewed:
Outback Rocky Mtn. Edition
Strength:
All wheel drive, handling, ABS, roomy interior, fuel economy, low maintenance, stereo (w/upgraded speakers), automatic trans 2nd gear start and nice gate from 3 to D which is handy in the mountains, as you use 3 & 4 gear unless roads are very bad (then use 2). Side cladding helps protect against rock chips. Rear limited slip diff works well.
Weakness:
Tires are soft and wear quickly (Firestones), AC is taxed on hot days, underpowered on hills at high altitude. Brake rotors prone to warping with heavy use. I wish Subaru offered the H6 without the leather and all the bells and whistles. I would pay another $2.5k for the 6 cyl but don't need leather, wood, or a Macintosh stereo. Great car for mountains or anywhere that weather and road conditions are hard to predict. Handles very well and confidently. Quiet inside and upgraded sound system components provide very good quality music. Very reliable and economical, averages 25-27 mpg in mixed driving with automatic and 4 cylinder. This is going up & down 4000 vertical feet daily. If I lived on the "flatlands" I would probably go for a Honda, but since we live in the mountains, AWD is a necessity. Also if you want to go skiing, nothing beats the security of AWD and ABS on snow and ice. Automatic trans has a 2nd gear start unless you punch it, which is good on slick roads. Dealer service has been good, but no problems with the car other than normal maintenance Similar Products Used: Land Rover Discovery II: Other end of the spectrum. The Subaru gets much better gas mileage, but I would not take an OB where I take the Discovery, which is anywhere off paved roads. The Subaru actually seems to handle normal dirt roads just as well or better with less tippy feel. |
[Jul 27, 2001]
Steve N.
Strength:
Nice motor at higher revs but overall a bit gutless. Funny as a boxer should be able to produce more bottom end torque.
Weakness:
Creature comforts and thought are lacking. Cramped interior,dumb cup holders (is that important?), no wagon area power door locks, no simultaneous 4 door unlocking, non pivoting outside mirrors, no rear seat reading lights, no low range, no skid plates, titanic front and rear bumper overhangs, no towing capacity, no reserve power for window lift after ignition is off, no automatic shutoff of the rear window defroster, no intermittent rear wiper setting, tiny single fluid resevoir for both window washers, moderate to low dash dimmer setting makes the radio readout disappear, extraordinary disc wear, warping and grinding (replacement Canuck Tire ones work better), weak airconditioning...and this is Canada!,constant on/off cycle clicking of air conditioner condenser relay behind the speedo can drive you nuts (am I stressed?), weak alternator (try putting all your accesories and lights on at idle), unsteady idle when cold: constant cold idle fluctuations (1000-1900rpm) with accessory loads, second mortgage pricing for parts, slow delivery of repair parts (2 weeks in the Vancouver shop waiting for front bumper "rebar" after 15km/$3500 Can$ impact), glass not lexan fog lights that are constantly being broken @$Can130, thin sheetmetal that bends by breathing on it, cheesy non functional hood scoop (for turbo intercooler on offshore models)Canadian models NEED the turbo. Forget the H6 unless you have more $$s than brains and want to advertise it. Sloping rear/side glass, incline of rear seats makes the cargo area tiny. No extra powerpoint in the front. The plastic hinged cover on the cargo PP snapped off in the first few months. Paul Hogan should be ashamed to promote this vehicle as anything other than a ski machine on tippy toes. Similar Products Used: 1996 Ford Explorer, 1993 Ford Taurus wagon, 1995 Mercury Sable Wagon, 1993 Subaru Legacy, 1990 Toyota Corolla, 1990 Volvo 760 Turbo, various 1980 - 1996 Ford, Chev 1/2, 3/4 ton PUs, 1993 Toyota 4runner, Nissan Pathfinder, 1991-94 Nissan 4x4 PUs, 1989 Isuzu Trooper, etc as lease/rented vehicles used in mineral exploration. The Scoobydoo was priced higher than it is worth. It's a lousy sport utility "wagon" but is an over hyped, expensive average car. |
[Jul 31, 2001]
Chip Houghton
Strength:
Fit and finish
Weakness:
Lack of power. After doing approx 100,000kms the car still feels solid and looks good inside and out. Fairly quite ride...changed the Michelin xw4's for Bridestones...also quite. The motor has sounded like a sewing machine from day one..especially when cold. Serious lack of power at low speeds probably due to the weight of the car...it's heavier than a Cherokee. Similar Products Used: 96 Cherokee Classic..The Cherokee has gobs of power but less space and can come anywhere near the Outbacks MPG...Jeep= 22MPG Outback=27MPG. |
[Aug 05, 2001]
Rick Gent
Model Reviewed:
Outback
Strength:
AWD is great in snow and rain. The low center of gravity makes this car handle like a sports model.Hard tell its a wagon! Engine is very smooth and quiet except on the highway.
Weakness:
Where should I begin? Let's start with the minor things first. The placement and angle of the cup holder, is that a thoughtless design or what? It blocks the heat/AC controls completely.The seat heater switches are also thoughtlessly placed where they can be turned on by accident.The climate control system makes it necessary to run the A/C year-round when ever people are in the back seats or the windows fog up so much no one can see out. This is especially handy in the winter. I have a 5SP trans model and I have never seen a shift lever that was so difficult to find the next gear. It seems to be a hit or miss affair when shifting up or down. I had a Honda before this car - Subaru would do well to copy their design its far better! The overall fit and finish of the car is not what I expected of such a pricy car. Adjustable intermittent wipers are also sorely needed. The sound system has 6 speakers and it still sounds lousy. It's funny,as bad as American cars are, the most basic Stereo with 2 speakers sounds better then the those from Japan! The brake pads wear the rotors down below allowable tolerances before the pads wear out which is why so many rotors warp as mine did.Lastly the clutch was shot at 70,000 miles, first time I ever had to replace a clutch in 35 years of driving standard shift vehicles. This car in my opinion needs 5th gear ratio changed. The car in 5th on the highway seems to need another gear to drop the engine speed down so it's not so noisy. Overall this car is not as refined as it should be for its cost.It does the one thing it was designed to do ( go in the snow ) very well. The AWD is much better than 4WD in any weather conditions. This fact has been proved to me many times. If your looking for a vehicle to go in the snow, this is your baby. If you also want reliability buy a Honda! Similar Products Used: Previous vehicle S-10 Blazer "UGH" the memorys of it are still to painful to recall. For all its faults its "light years" ahead of the S-10 |
[Aug 23, 2001]
Dustin McIntosh
Model Reviewed:
Outback
Strength:
Price, AWD, Gas milage, Cargo/passanger space, new and improved cup holders for those of you that are to closed in to see them, better ride, better insulation for road noise, better engine/transmission mounts, more tourque, nicer interior,....should I go on....?
Weakness:
I must admit that it's still a bit underpowered, however, that's what the new H6 3.0L is for. It's quite sufficent for my needs and I'm not running a SCCA circut race, I'm driving my family around in it and my wife doesn't seem to have any complaints. Are wee all to hung up on the knuckle draggers of the industry? Subaru has the WRX for that. Get over it. I leased my 2000 Outback just a touch over a year ago and have been driving Subaru's for about 3 years and have put aside any and all desires for any other vehicle in it's class. I leased a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee and didn't have any real problems with it however for the price, convenience, practicality, efficiency, and economic aspects, the Outback cannot be beat. It has one of two ONLY available true AWD systems in the industry and handles better than any other vehicle I've ever driven of it's kind. I considered Dodge/Chrysler products (being a previouse Chrysler owner), Chevy, Volvo, Volkswagen, Audi, and Mazda and I must say that overall the Subaru was the obvious choice for many reasons. I won't trade Makes for several years to come and as far as Models...ya never know what Subaru will be coming out with. I have had Hondas, VeeDubs, Toyotas, BMWs, Chrysler "Stuff", Ford, and even a few GM products...nothing compared to my Subaru! Similar Products Used: see above... |