Toyota 4Runner SUV | Crossover
Toyota 4Runner SUV | Crossover
|
[Nov 09, 1999]
Brian
Strength:
Rock-solid frame (after simple $35 brace is added) for rugged 4x4 performance, excellent low range gearing, long enough to sleep in the back, nice shoulder room for this size vehicle, great visibility (pillars are in the right places), haven't had anything fail since I bought it 5 years and 99,000 miles ago.
Weakness:
Since moving east the tailgate is rusting. Not sufficient ventillation to get the moisture out from inside the gate. Mine has worm/roller steering, which is vague but truck-like and it IS a truck. New model rack/pinion is much better. Wish is gave heat as quickly as a German vehicle (past German stuff always gave heat right away). Has a huge turning circle. This truck's been all through Baja Norte, SoCal, NoCal, Arizona, Colorado, Penn, and New York, and it is a rock. There is nothing serious that I would change. It rides nicely, is easy to maneuver off road, has plenty of clearance, and there are no delicate things hanging low underneath. Cargo is big, cubbys are sufficient, gearing is broad enough, luxury is high enough, and the sunroof is huge. Similar Products Used: Had an Explorer Sport before this and the tranny synchros died at 70k miles (but it sure had great torque!). Test drove everything; Pathfinder (ugly, cramped, poor details), Trooper (noisy chain-driven cams, top-heavy feel), Mitsu (flashy but no performance off road), Rodeo/Passport (underpowered, weak frame/body design, lesser-quality interior), Grand Cherokee (no standard tranny, lowest thing hanging down is exhaust so kiss your motor mounts goodbye after a big smack, cheesy interior plastic, spare takes 1/3 of the cargo area). |
|
[Nov 04, 1999]
Eric
Model Reviewed:
SR5
Strength:
-Toyota quality and resale
Weakness:
-Under powered The truck can be very well appointed and if taken care will show almost no wear-&-tear. There is not so much a lack of power as the transmission is tailored to low end torque; this is usually only a factor at highway speed. The '96 and newer models remedy this slightly. Ride can sometimes be jarring but if you are driving this type of car that usually isn't a concern. Never had a problem with tailgate despite other reviews. Without a doubt one of the better cars I have owned/driven Similar Products Used: -1996 4Runner SR5 |
|
[Nov 14, 1999]
Daniel Ramrus
Strength:
burley chassis, good power, looks good, 4wd rules, I like the removeable top
Weakness:
gas mileage (what did you expect), rough ride, AC is not that strong especially when sitting in traffic burley chassis, good power, looks good, 4wd rules, I like the removeable top Similar Products Used: Cherkee |
|
[Oct 27, 1999]
Mgoony
Model Reviewed:
Limited
Strength:
Good gas mileage
Weakness:
Engine is to small compared to the rest of the SUVs in its class I must agree with the prior statement regarding the rear hatch problems. I have had mine replaced 3 times. Similar Products Used: 1995 Isuzu Rodeo |
|
[Oct 28, 1999]
Ben
Model Reviewed:
limited
Strength:
easy to drive
Weakness:
weak engine - no power to pass i have been happy with my 4-runner. had a few weird problems but not the fault of the car. i think its really easy to drive. it would be nice if the engine was a little more powerful b/c its hard to pass when you're at highway speeds. Similar Products Used: Ford Bronco II |
|
[Oct 20, 1999]
Jim
Model Reviewed:
2WD/4 cyl
Strength:
No engine problems
Weakness:
Continuing problem with rear hatch The luster has worn off for us after having it in the shop for about the 5th time because the rear hatch won't open. Got a Toyota because we've had such incredible success with our Previa, but the hatch problem is maddening. Engine seems to be rock solid though so at least we haven't been stranded anywhere. Although we didn't notice it too much at first, we've come to dislike the rough ride. |
|
[Oct 21, 1999]
Visage
Strength:
-Lots of torque off the line
Weakness:
-Lack of power at high speeds The somewhat stiff suspension is nice at times and bad at others. There's lots of power off the line with torque values high in the low RPMs, but doesn't have too much power to attack a hill at 70+mph or for passing. Its sweet in the snow! |
|
[Jan 28, 2001]
Mecca Girl
Model Reviewed:
V-6 Medallist
Strength:
Reliability, reliability, reliability
Weakness:
The engineers at Toyota back in the early 90's when the scaled up 4-Runner came out, obviously didn't think much about the rear window design. The tail gate only drops down when the window is fully retracted. The problem with this design has obviously been ironed out for the newer models, but those of us with the older 90's models are stuck with an inherently idiotic design. Dirt and grit and water accumulate on the window and then trickle down to the rear window motor, which eventually seizes up and ceases to work. Now, I can live with out the use of the rear window, no problem and did so for over a year, until my rear tail light burned out. Guess what? The only way to change it is to lower the window and then lower the tail gate. So now, instead of a lightbulb costing me $1.59 to replace, it's an over $1200.00 major job to replace it. And yes, I could go ahead and replace the window, but three years down the road, I'm looking at another $1200.00 to replace the window motor again. Stupid, stupid, stupid design. Not real thrilled with that and it's practically enough for me to suggest you go out and consider buying either a new 4-Runner, if you can afford it, or consider some of the other SUV's, either way, be prepared to run into problems with the rear window. Avoid the older models because of the rear window problems. That's pretty major. Similar Products Used: Ford Exploxer. My brother has a new model Explorer and after two years it looks way older than mine. |
|
[Feb 05, 2001]
Ashamed OfHp
Strength:
Toyota Name, reliablity, great looks.
Weakness:
Who would ever think of putting a 4cyl in such a big truck? The makers of Toyota of this truck should be ashamed of themselves. Pretty bumpy ride, I had a jeep that wasnt as bumpy as this. Toyota 4Runner are great looking SUV's, they are dependable and will last you forever. DONT BUY ONE IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR POWER. They are weak in power and over priced. You'd be better off with a Tahoe, or the new Pathfinders. Similar Products Used: NOTHING, nothing has a weak engine like it. |
|
[Jun 08, 2001]
Chris
Model Reviewed:
Limited 4x4
Strength:
Roomy, I'm 6'6" 240lbs. I fit with no problems!
Weakness:
Sometimes has a harsh ride if there is a heavy load in the back, or towing, but easily fixed with a 10$ ring spacer, best 10$ I've ever spent! Absolutely the best SUV I have ever been in, driven, or owned! Great reliability and I know my family and friends will be safe in it! Drives smooth, shifts gears smooth, worth the money! Similar Products Used: I've been in and driven late model Grand Cherokee's, 97 Limited, and 00 Limited with the V8's. They do have more pick up, but the ride is not as smooth as the 4Runner. I've been in GMC Jimmy's, Envoy's and Chevy Blazers, old and new. The power is about the same, but again, the overall feel of the ride is no comparison! 4Runner wins hands down! The Xterra is an SUV on the outside, but does not perform like the 4Runner. I have two friends with Xterra's and neither one can go offroad and do things my 4Runner can! Xterra's make good grocery getters, but for total use of an SUV, the 4Runner is much better! |


