Dodge Grand Caravan Minivans | Wagons
Dodge Grand Caravan Minivans | Wagons
|
[Jul 17, 2001]
Charles R. Dochnahl
Strength:
Looks,Handling & Room
Weakness:
Noisy and not good on braking Took delivery of caravan in March of 99. Liked room and both sliding doors Similar Products Used: 92 Dodge Aries,88 Plymouth Volaire, 92 Chyrsler Labaron |
|
[Nov 30, 1999]
Roger Chaar
Strength:
Styling is second to none. Price is on-target.
Weakness:
Too noisy and quality is questionable. (pre 1997 Model) - I'll be the first to admit it, but it was the styling that got me to buy the van. Compared to what was out there at the time, it was quite beautiful (and still is). And the price was very reasonable. Unfortunately, you get what you pay for. Cabin noise is very bad and the car itself is not particularily well built. Also, after only one winter here in Quebec, the car immediately began to show signs of rust. Other things that bugged me were its pea-sized gas tank and the day-time headlights which burned out faster than cheap XMas lights. Otherwise, it is a car that holds its own and gets you and your cargo from point A to point B. |
|
[Aug 18, 2001]
Dave
Model Reviewed:
Sport
Strength:
Appearance and ergonomics, performance when operating correctly.
Weakness:
Total lack of confidence in the vehicle, poor design of left driveshaft and transmission (which we replaced at 56k miles). I have encountered a SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE which Chrysler should remedy with a recall. The following incident occured July 14, 2001 and the vehicle had 63,262 miles on it. This is a CRITICAL PART FAILURE caused by rusting, and owners of vehicles of about the same age as mine (6 years) should be WARNED. I have reported this to the NHTSA, but I have no idea how efficient they are. Notifying Chrysler was a frustrating waste of time. I will never buy another Chrysler vehicle. Similar Products Used: Have driven Ford minivans which do not handle as well and are not as comfortable. |
|
[Aug 17, 2001]
Jim H
Strength:
Looks
Weakness:
under powered brakes I purchased the van in late December of 2000. It was used with 24,000 miles. Similar Products Used: NA |
|
[Aug 17, 2001]
Charles Cahill
Model Reviewed:
Dodge Grand Caravan LE
Strength:
Design, Comfort, Appearance, Utility.
Weakness:
Chrysler Quality! Chrysler Service Departments, I've been to many and I mean many, they're all terrible. Chrysler Corp. you have to play hardball to get them to honor their warranties. Their Transmissions crap out between 50K - 70K, and the exterior paint peels after three years. Buy the extended warranty to cover the transmission! This is our second Chrysler Van, they're very well designed, spacious, comfortable family vehicles especially for long trips. They can't be beat for praticality, fuel efficiency and general reliability. However, I'd be hard pressed to pay more than $24,000 for one again! Chrysler quality and service is terrible! They're what gives American Cars a Bad Name! Be prepared to fight for warranty work! It's too bad, the design of the vehicle is in my opinion the best. Unfortunately the quality of the components are poor at best. Chrysler could learn a thing or two from Toyota & Honda when it comes to overall quality. Although, the Mitsibishi 3.3 liter engine is bullet proof, a must if you're considering Chrysler. Similar Products Used: Honda & Toyota vans are FAR superior in quality but not in design! |
|
[Aug 16, 2001]
Ileana
Model Reviewed:
Grand Caravan
Strength:
Comfortable for long trips. Roomy for driving children around.
Weakness:
Continuous Electrical Problems. Horrible experience with this van. The brakes have had to be replaced at least once a year. The tires wear quickly. The electrical problems have been endless. Check engine light, air bag light, abs light all keep showing up. Fuses blow all the time. Power window and lock motors have been replaced at least three times. The back wiper motor has had to be replaced twice. The defrost system in the back window shattered the back window in the middle of a highway while driving in a snow storm with my infant daughter. The motor for the back wing windows gave out and I have not replace it. The A/C did not work for 2 years and all of the sudden the dealer tells me it just needed re-charging. Talking about the dealer service, it could not be worse. When I tried to fix the A/C before they told me the whole system had to be changed ($1500) now two years later, they figure it just need to be replaced. Have encounter endless stalling and transmission problems. Awful, awful vehicle! Do not recommend anybody buys it. Similar Products Used: This is our first van. We also own a 92 Saturn which has not given us any big problems and already has about 200,000 miles. |
|
[Aug 14, 2001]
Dawn Smith
Model Reviewed:
Grand Caravan
Strength:
Hmmm... let me see...oh ya ...it was a non-smoking vehicle so it doesn't smell like an ashtray
Weakness:
Just where do I begin??!?!? A GREAT BIG PILE OF POOP!!! I am so disgusted and as soon as I get the pile of junk back from the transmission shop I am trading it in ...Bought this van in oct. 2000 and hope to not have it by this oct. Similar Products Used: HONDA ACCORD--AWESOME VEHICLE...WHOLE HEARTEDLY RECCOMMEND..PONTIAC FIREBIRD (OWNED 7 YRS NEVER A MAJOR PROBLEM)...CHEVY MALIBU (GOOD SOLID VEHICLE) |
|
[Aug 13, 2001]
wade
Strength:
roominess,visability, seating arrangments
Weakness:
suspspension, heat and a/c very weak, interior plastics very fragile,manual windows that will not stay open, head gasketts, wiring(seems hap hazard), van itself is easily stolen as a child with a screw driver could run off with your investment!! this is my second caravan, my first was an 88, that brought all my three kids home from the hospital as they were born, for that reason i would have love to keep it but would have had to give back one child to cover repair bills. anyway out of sentiment we bought another and i guess we must have gottin one made on a wednsday because in the year and a half we,ve owned it we have not had any major failures ,as we did with our first caravan. as of right now my day time running lights flicker on and off as i apply and release my brakes, my emergency brake indicator light also goes on and off in tandem, but all in all we,re cautiously happy as we all are aware of the potential tranny woes that can spring up at anytime, and yes i really do think the service personell at all chrysler dealerships could use a human relations course. the sliding door i find can be of concern around small children as it rolls shut even on the slightest of inclines, little fingers are in danger of being sqwat. do some homework and take your time and i,m sure you can come across a tuesday or wednesday caravan somewhere :-) Similar Products Used: also own an 91 tercel and the caravan does what it is supposed to do as does the tercel, which is to move you about cheaply and reliably |
|
[Jul 21, 2001]
Kevin
Model Reviewed:
Dodge Caravan
Strength:
My likes it because it's easy to load children.
Weakness:
Brakes, transmission, door latches, wiring, interior design, body flexing Brought it to haul the kids, had 48K on it now only has 55K. Similar Products Used: Nothing to compare it to, not going to give Chysler a chance with another lemon. |
|
[Jul 21, 2001]
jacquie
Strength:
excellent motor,well built
Weakness:
TRANSMISSION plenty of room,comfortable.Nice drive,but,a serious money pit.I had two transmissions replaced under extended warranty,again when warranty ended and now the van sits a big white lawn decoration,new computer system,new battery,new tires,etc....with,yes a transmission problem,this time the transmission literally shot a whole through itself.Talk to a transmission specialist before buying one,seems everyone except dodge knows about the tranny problem!A real shame because other then the awful transmission,an excellent ride. Similar Products Used: plymouth voyager-much more comfortable,better drive,more solid then the voyager-same transmission |


