Ford Explorer (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
Ford Explorer (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
|
[Jan 10, 2000]
JP
Model Reviewed:
xlt
Strength:
Solid, decently engineered vehicle. Nice & durable interior/exterior. Except front brakes, everything wears/ages exceptionally well; exterior - good chrome/paint/seals, interior - good upholstery/headliner/JBL sound system, tires, exhaust, etc. Low, Low cost of operation. Parts & service available everywhere & at anytime. Quality aftermarket upgrades galore. Aside from it's rigid ride, it's comfortable on long trips.
Weakness:
Radiator, fan clutch & blades, antiquated front disc brake system. Valve cover gaskets are hard to access. After racking up the miles on 3 new Jeeps (electrical disaster in my '95 G. Cherokee), I bought a well maintained used Explorer w/56k for $9,800 (4 yrs ago) with the intention of running it into the ground. I now have 150k and I sense another 25 to 50 without major engine/trans failure. Not too bad. The standard components have gone out - power steering pump, water pump, exhaust, driver's side caliper. That's about it. These parts are so cheap & available everywhere; this has been by far the cheapest car for me to operate aside from old Honda Accords. Unlike the horrible mid '90's F150 pickup trans. this is the original auto. trans., is showing no signs of problems & is strong & smooth (Maybe I'm lucky - I haven't done any significant towing). Engine has excellent punch & smooth performance at all speeds, although minor valve cover leaks & radiator seal seepage. Leather interior is very durable - no cracks/splits, and front seats are comfortable. This black XLT can clean up to look like a 3 year old. Similar Products Used: Owned new: '91, '92 Jeep Cherokees; '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee, '00 Honda Odyssey; used Toyota Landcruiser, International Scout, Honda Accords, Mazda rotaries, etc. |
|
[Jan 10, 2000]
Roy
Model Reviewed:
sport
Strength:
REliability, Storage, Comfort on the road, Easy access for oil change
Weakness:
Brakes, can be rough on bumpy roads, rear windshiedl wahser/wiper Back in 1993 I got this for under 18G. Now they are so popular teh price is well over 20G. This is beyond my comfort limit for a vehicle. Besides that it has been reliable and tows my jetski and such easily. Not the greates acceleration esp from 50 to 70 nor gas mileage but folks wake up! It is a truck not a sports car or econo-box. Mine is comofortable esp on road trips plenty of room. Because of the increased popularity the prices have gone up substantially so I wouldbe hard pressed to bu another one. But I guess I can say that it is the best in its class Similar Products Used: First one |
|
[Jan 11, 2000]
Chris Ceykovsky
Model Reviewed:
Ford Explorer 4Dr XLT
Strength:
A lot of options, comfort, quiet, powerful overall.
Weakness:
Gas mileage, to be expected Paid 19000 for it and it's worth every penny. When I stomp the gas it goes like hell, and when I just want to cruise around it looks sharp. The interior is relaxing and comfy. Power everything to include backseat controls for air and the stereo. Similar Products Used: Pathfinder |
|
[Jan 11, 2000]
Steve
Strength:
The Exterior is attractive and the seats are is comfortable.
Weakness:
Handling, Braking, acceleration, gas mileage, heater sucks, every mechanical part is ready to fall apart! As shown by the strengths and weaknesses, do NOT buy this piece of trash! You can get good looks and comfortable seats in many SUV's, but this thing became a piece of crap after 40,000 miles! It has NO juice. Passing is dangerous with such a weak engine. A Geo Metro could pass this thing on the highway! When it does get going, watch out! I almost could put my foot out the door to stop faster than to use the brakes. The handling is the worst--interstate driving is a nightmare. The seats are comfortable, but that is about all that works well. |
|
[Jan 13, 2000]
Kevin
Strength:
Reliable.
Weakness:
Acceleration. I bought this truck new in February of 1996 for about 23,500 (MSRP was around 27,500). I drove it quite a bit and when I got rid of it this past December, it had 85,000 miles on it. I never had a mechanical problem with it. I used synthetic oil and changed it every 4000 miles or so (give or take 1000 miles) and rotated my own tires (got 75,000 miles out of original tires). At around 70,000 miles, I took it in to the dealer and had them change the fluids oil, transmission, rear, transfer case and other items included in the 65000 mile tune-up. Other than that (and the oil/air filter change), nothing was done to it through its history. My wife had a 1996 GMC Jimmy that had low miles and was plagued with problems. We at first planned to get rid of my car and keep hers because it had the low miles, but we decided to ditch it (for a FORD Mustang) and keep mine as her warranty was aboutto expire and we knew we'd be shelling out money to keep the bucket of crap running. I would definitely buy Ford products in the future if they are all this reliable (we will see with mmy wife's Mustang). Similar Products Used: 1996 GMC Jimmy |
|
[Dec 21, 1999]
duane buchanan
Model Reviewed:
Ford Explorer
Strength:
Good power
Weakness:
Very jerky rough ride, worse than a F700. $26000 Similar Products Used: 93 Explorer |
|
[Jan 02, 2000]
T
Model Reviewed:
Eddie Bauer
Strength:
Very agile when upgraded to Tokico shocks. Lots of room for most items. Reliability. Gas mileage
Weakness:
Ride can be rough. Plastic parts will break and fail. Sunroof leaks, had to seal mine. Paid 9000 for mine used. I like the leather seats in the EB edition. I find that I can drive all day and not be beaten to death like foreign SUV's. Payload will handle almost anything you would want to carry. Ride can be a bit rough, but switching to Tokico shocks makes a world of difference. I also like that I can make a U-turn and park in a regular space. The engine has been extremely reliable with regular maint. i have 230K miles and still going. Have replaced 1 transmission, + radiator and a/c components due to the meshing of plastic and metal parts. The plastic dries out and cracks, particularly the fan blades. All in all a good vehicle. I would buy one again if the price were right. |
|
[Dec 25, 1999]
Barry
Model Reviewed:
XL
Strength:
Loads of interior space
Weakness:
Paint easy to scratch I've been driving SUV's for the past Similar Products Used: 1987 Chevy Blazer |
|
[Dec 07, 1999]
Dan
Model Reviewed:
xlt
Strength:
-Good in snow and in the rain.
Weakness:
BRAKES SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I feel that the ford explorer is one of the best SUV's. Similar Products Used: Blazer (93') |
|
[Dec 07, 1999]
Glenn Abu-El-Haj
Model Reviewed:
Explorer Eddie Bauer
Strength:
Engine
Weakness:
Brakes I can tow my boat which weighs over 3,ooo pounds to almost anywhere in Souther California. Very seldom get stuck on slippery launch ramps. I can also carry my cargo when towing the boat. Seating is fine for 5 people while doing so. Similar Products Used: GMC Suburban |


