Nissan Murano (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
Nissan Murano (2010 and older) SUV | Crossover
[Jul 12, 2008]
GM Cloutier
Model Reviewed:
Nissan Murano
Strength:
Great handling.
Weakness:
No accessories would work unless the engine was running, which also means no radio. Traveling mechanical engineer. Rented a new 2009 Nissan Murano, on July 11-2008, after 5 days of city driving of a total of 153 miles, of which 60 of those miles were highway, all flat terrain, 85 Noctane gas, always slow acceleration from a stop position, my mpg was only 17.4. Nice handling, windows have poor visibility for both right and left blindspots. I had a strange pod-like key, inserted in a hole in the dashboard, and I had to press the brake while pushing a button on the dashboard to start engine. Stopping the engine was by pressing the same button. When the pod-like key was inserted (with no engine running) no accessories would work. I liked the radio show I was listening to, but when I stopped the engine, the radio went dead, so I had to run the engine to hear the radio while I sat and waited for my passenger to come back in the car. Similar Products Used: Many similar SUVs have same or better mpg fuel economy. |
[Apr 17, 2008]
Belle0206
Model Reviewed:
nissan murano Sl
Strength:
strong and high
Weakness:
engine failure and engine sludge for no reason
I leased this SUV in April of 2004
|
[Feb 05, 2008]
jspicoli4
Strength:
great at first...buyer beware
Weakness:
Worst car I've ever owned...A dodge Neon used to hold this title. It was a low end vehicle so you can't expect much. The Murano has a high end pricetag with crap technology. Could buy a new lowend car for the price of replacing Nissan's faulty transmission. Murano buyers will all love the car at first but when the car reaches higher miles that transmission will fail like so many others who are experiencing that now I've noticed the early posts everyone loved the car...now that they are getting older and breaking down the reviews have changed.
Similar Products Used: Honda CRV, Toyoto Rav4
|
[Jan 29, 2008]
CARMAN51
Model Reviewed:
murano
Strength:
great ride
Weakness:
poor take off if needed. I love the car but hate the poor gas milage. 10mpg city at best, 20 highway.
Similar Products Used: Dodge Caravan |
[Jan 29, 2008]
Al
Model Reviewed:
murano
Strength:
A nice smooth and high ride. A great highway cruiser.Have driven it south 3 times and love it except the high cost of operations.
Weakness:
Very poor gas milage, city about 12mpg highway best at 21 mpg. I love this car but have had the wiper blades replaced twice and they still do nor always wipe clean in light rain.
Similar Products Used: I have had two Dodge Caravans before this car. |
[Nov 20, 2007]
James
Model Reviewed:
Nissan Murano SL
Strength:
The advance design of this SUV is out past most other manufacturer, it is still the best shape after five years on the road.
Weakness:
I found there are area should be improved in mechanical. I have the noise since 60,000km from the engine, when the car starts in low speed, it makes wee wee noise, and it is bug me. Good but not good enough as Nissan Similar Products Used: Go with Toyota & Honda |
[Oct 30, 2007]
Thomas P
Model Reviewed:
SL AWD
Strength:
Almost everything but engine/powertrain/CVT above all
Weakness:
Accelaration a bit too soft but that's a matter of temperament. Stereo is also a bit oudated Well, I've read some of the reviews and I quite surprised with the discrepancy of opinions. Murano is a great car. Does not pretend anytrhing more than it is. Reliability issues that are expressed in here are mostly due to the fact that you guys you are buying Murano's for the American market. I bought mine targeted at European consumer (tougher standards, higher technical benchmark,...) For example - different brakes quality, better assembling, less power - mor lb's per rpm, etc..
Similar Products Used: Pathfinder, BMW X5, Tribeca |
[Oct 24, 2007]
Owner
Model Reviewed:
Nissan Murano S AWD
Needed something I could tolerate on a daily basis that could tow motorcycles. Chose this over the FX-35/FX-45 because of the better gas mileage.
|
[Aug 05, 2007]
William
Model Reviewed:
Murano SE
Strength:
NONE - DO NOT PURCHASE
Weakness:
Delays in proper acceleration. Mechanical problems that the Nissan team can not correct. I purchased the Murano and loved it until it started to fail as a reliable vehicle. Before 20,000 miles I experienced a grinding sensation in the use of the gas peddle for acceleration and a steady vibration sound in the vehicle. Nissan tried to fix the problem several times and could not truly pinpoint the problem. After multiple tries and disappointments, I made the mistake of trading it for a 2007. That review is in here also. The 2007 Murano SL has less than 10,000 miles and the power steering is failing intermittenly. I am afraid that it will fail in an intersection causing an accident. I recommend that NO ONE buy a Murano. I am currently working with Nissan for a third time at this point to correct the problem. |
[Jul 24, 2007]
sean farrell
Model Reviewed:
murano
Strength:
Nice drive. Smooth acceleration. Power.
Weakness:
Reliability. Road noise. Poor air conditioning. Nissan have a problem with the CVT that results in a lag time of 2-3 seconds before the car accelerates after the gas pedal is depressed. This problem started happening at about 40K miles for me on hot days in traffic. Others are reporting the same problem in the older Muranos however Nissan has not made any announcement about it. The problem is in a pressure sensor, however fixing it requires a major transmission overhaul or replacement.
|