Toyota Camry (2010 and older) Midsize | Compact
Toyota Camry (2010 and older) Midsize | Compact
|
[Jul 18, 2001]
Steve Smith
Model Reviewed:
Camry
Strength:
Reliability
Weakness:
Paint seems to chip and scratch a little too easily, but this is a car that's never seen a day in a garage. It is what it is. I bought a used, bare bones, 1995 DX 5 speed in 1996. The only option was A/C. It was to replace my wife's 2 door Accord (great car!) after our first child was born. The car was "certified" and had 24k on the odometer. Now, almost 5 years later, it has almost 60k miles on it. The most remarkable thing is that NOTHING has gone wrong with it. Other than gas, oil changes, a new battery this year, and routine preventive maintenance, I haven't put a dime in it and it's never left me stranded. Sure, it's about the most boring car on the road, but so what? It's still as tight as drum after almost 5 years as a mommy car (3 kids now). With the 5 speed, acceleration is adequate and handling is O.K., but not spectacular. It cruises well at any legal speed, but the lack of cruise control prevents its use on long trips. If you want a roomy, comfortable and RELIABLE (what's this crap about oil sludge? Are these people GM operatives?) car, used Camry's are a bargain. Especially the 5 speeds. Similar Products Used: Honda Accord coupe. Subaru Legacy wagon. Compares well to both. |
|
[Jul 17, 2001]
George
Model Reviewed:
Camry XLE V6
Strength:
Smooth ride, dependable...
Weakness:
the seating could be more comfortable, A pretty reliable car, the camry 2000 xle v6 has been pushed to the limit. I've been driving this car for appox. two years now, and it has given me any problems. It's a nice car that will take care of you, if you take care of it. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jul 17, 2001]
Dan
Model Reviewed:
/Camry XLE V6
Strength:
Good feeling of confidence, security and you cannot stop thinking: "this is a nice ride" while driving.
Weakness:
Not so well built as my old 1992 Camry LE (4 cyl): We have traded-in our '92 Camry LE and we decided for the XLE to get more power, but also to get some of the features of the '92 which are nonexistent now in the current LE model. Similar Products Used: Camry LE 1992 (4cyl) - better built, better road handling (sportier), less power |
|
[Oct 15, 1999]
Bob
Model Reviewed:
Toyota Camry
Strength:
Reliability. Integrity of body structure.
Weakness:
Exterior door trim below passenger door rusted. (pre 1997 Model) - My Camry is a 1988 model, 4cyl with manual transmission. It has been stone reliable from day one. There are no body squeeks anywhere. I have never had a failure of any part outside of headlight lamp and normal rust through of exhaust parts. I would buy another Toyota product in a heartbeat. My Camrey has been my daily driver for almost 12 years, and 134K miles. |
|
[Aug 17, 2001]
C. B.
Model Reviewed:
V6
Strength:
Smooth ride
Weakness:
ENGINE SLUDGE My previous cars have been a Chevy Monza I had for 7 years, a pontiac V8 Trans Am I had for 5 years, and a 1989 Honda Accord I had for 10 years and put 160,000 miles on it before trading it in. The Honda was such a reliable car I was only going to consider another Honda accord or a toyota camry. I thought that Toyota would be the same good quality that the Honda had been. I test drove the 99 Honda but there seemed to be few style changes from the 1989 model. So unfortunately I decided to try a Toyota Camry this time. My friend who was also previously a Honda Accord owner and who subsiquently bought a toyota corolla warned me that the toyota service department was terrible. But I wanted something different so I bought it anyway thinking it was just the dealership in her area. WRONG. Same story as all the other sludge owners. I was a little luckier than some, my sludge happened at 45,000 miles. I went to 3 toyota dealerships and none will honor the warranty. The first 2 dealerships said I needed a new engine for $6,000. the third said I needed some valve seals and sludge cleaning for only $4,800. I have only had this car for 3 years. This has never happened in any of our other cars. My husband currently has a 1991 Honda CRX with 100,000 miles and no sludge. I called my Honda service department to see if they could work on the Toyota (they can't) but they told me Toyota has internal documents that discuss the sludge problem and a fix for it. Searching for documentation on it to present to the dealer if anyone knows where to get it email me please. Similar Products Used: Honda Accord. Camry is prettier but Accord is much sounder mechanically. |
|
[Aug 13, 2001]
Phillip
Strength:
nice speed,good brakes also. nice space in rear,it also has a good factory stereo.a/c gets very cold
Weakness:
glove box will not unlock good car only had to replace transmission @ 150,000 miles.i had no major problems with this car besides the transmission. Then @ 197,000 replaced the muffler. Similar Products Used: 2000 chevrolet prizm no match |
|
[Jul 20, 2001]
T H
Model Reviewed:
LE V6
Strength:
Of course Toyota reliability. Sophisticated and mannerly V6. Quiet, oh so quiet. Cold A/C. Decently appointed with the usual creature comforts. Adequate space for maps, CDs, slurppy, et al. Cushy American style big car ride. Full size spare tire. Yah, Baby!
Weakness:
Few, but here I go...The paint albeit nicely applied, seems to scratch and chip easily. The body panels seem a little thin and prone to dents, but that seems to be the case with most modern cars. The Camry is true to its aim and target audience. Similar Products Used: Honda Accord, Cadillac Eldorado, Cadillac Deville |
|
[Jul 19, 2001]
shirley
Model Reviewed:
Camry LE
Strength:
-quality and reliability
Weakness:
-price After 4 years, this car still drives great. The 4 banger isn't that strong at 132hp, but acceleration in city and highway is respectable. And it's quite quiet in operation. The suspension is way too soft, causing the car to bounce excessively over small bumps. Also the muffler is placed too low, it's always hitting speed bumps. But the interior quality is great, although a buzz in the front vents has surfaced. Rear legroom is ample and the seats are comfortable. The overall wedge-shape is nice, but bland. And the paint scratches too often during highway cruising. Also, the body gets dented very easily. But my overall driving impression is nice. Similar Products Used: '97 Accord-redesigned for '98, so not considered |
|
[Jul 20, 2001]
Ron Himebaugh
Model Reviewed:
Camry LE
Strength:
Gas mileage is OK, radio still works, interior heats up fast in winter. Good visibility.
Weakness:
Poor mechanical quality, average or less interior quality, uncomfortable seats for distance driving, very lame dealer, poor warranty response, uninformative and arbitrary 1-800 contact in Torrance, CA. Good luck if you call them. Front rotors warped and shot at 48K miles, replaced by independent garage at $300/brake job. At 51250 miles, car broke down on road trip, couldn't get local Toyota service, had car towed to my guy. Toyota won't honor "emergency clause" in warranty, said I had to go to Toyota, even though the dealer I visited didn't know about 60,00 mile warranty. I get the feeling that Toyota wants to brag about their reliability, but they don't want to fix cars under warranty. I'm still fighting, will go to arbitration as needed. I for one am very dissatisfied with Toyota "quality" and even more unhappy with their attitude toward their customers. They also need to train their dealers as to warranty policy. Not a car that I can recommend to anyone for any purpose other than tossing money away. Similar Products Used: 98 Olds Cutlass (better car), 95 Taurus (also better) |
|
[Jul 23, 2001]
Walter
Model Reviewed:
LE V6
Strength:
Very nice ride, quiet, handles good, really good stereo, comfortable.
Weakness:
Service department sucks, cheap paint, cheap tires. I believe, but can't prove, that the salesmen abused this car before I picked it up. The clutch was burned when I got it and every salesman I ran into on the way in told me how much I would love the car because it was very fast. Since V-6, 5-speed Camrys are as rare as hen's teeth I wonder how they knew? LE, V6, 5-speed, sunroof, leather, 6-speaker stereo. This is a pretty nice car - very quiet, smooth, handles good, great stereo (I never even listened to it before buying it - I already had an appointment with a stereo shop to install a new stereo when I realized I didn't need one). But I've had a lot of problems with this car. The first things I noticed were the clutch, which was very rough, and the paint, which was very cheap. I never could get the paint cleaned up very well. The car is black and you can see water spots on it that just won't go away no matter how expensive a cleaner you use. The car is now completely covered with chips. Also, the pinstripe was pealing off after only 2-3 months so I pulled it off. It looks better without it anyway. The next thing was a rattle/squeak in a panel between the doors. It drove me nuts for weeks before I could take it in, but they fixed it for free. The next problem was more serious - it pulled pretty hard to the left. After taking it in 3-4 times it is still pulling. I've taken it to two different dealers and they both claim it is the tires. Pretty convenient for them since by the time the tires are replaced the warranty is out. We'll see soon since I have almost 50,000 miles now. And speaking of the tires, they (Dunlops) hydroplane like crazy when it rains. The first time it happened I pulled over in the rain to check all the lug nuts - I didn't know what was going on so I thought the tires might be falling off. Much more serious than the tires was the clutch. The throwout bearing started rattling within a week or two of picking up the car. I took it in 2-3 times to have that looked at but every time they told me nothing was wrong. I finally took it to another dealer and they said that not only was the bearing bad, but the clutch was burned too and needed to be replaced (which they did for free). I have a Mazda that had over 200,000 miles on it before I needed a clutch so I know it wasn't my fault. That would explain why it was so rough when I picked it up. To add more irritation they forgot to tighten up the motor mounts after putting it back together so that caused yet another trip. Then there was the exhaust leak and a new windshield washer motor. The later took two trips because they got the wrong part in. I now have 47,000 miles on it and it appears everything except the pulling and cheap paint fixed, but it has been really aggravating because I bought the Camry almost solely on Toyota's reliability record. I will not be buying a Toyota in the near future, and certainly not from the dealer I used. I cannot recommend this car. Since it's not a sports car or a luxury car the only real reason to want it is it's reliability and I'm not very impressed with that. Similar Products Used: '91 Mazda MX-6 (yeah, I know they aren't comparable) The Camry is much quiter, especially on the highway. It is smoother, more comfortable, much better stereo. In other words better in almost every way, except reliablity. The Mazda has over 210,000 miles and has been in the shop less than half as many times as the Camry after 1 year. I bought it new and the only real weakness was a cheap, easily breakable speedometer gear drive (which has to be removed to check transmission fluid). All the accessories (air, alternator, water pump, etc) have never been replaced and work fine. I will consider myself luck to get 100,000 miles out of the Camry. |


