Chevrolet Tahoe SUV | Crossover
Chevrolet Tahoe SUV | Crossover
[Sep 01, 2000]
Dewayne
Model Reviewed:
Z71 Tahoe
Strength:
Extremely roomy. Rides better than mom's Cadilac STS. More power than other SUVs in any class. I have towed a couple of boats 18-30ft. and it did great. Best 4wd system on the market aside from Land Rover and Hummer.
Weakness:
Breaking is definitely the most noticeable weak point. After 10k miles, change the pads. After you turn the rotors for the 1st time, they just get worse from there on out. We have been experiencing 100+ degree temps and the air conditioning could use a dose of the old R12 refrigerant instead of the noticeably weak 134a. Sticker MSRP:40,645 Similar Products Used: Dodge Durango, Ford Expedition, Ford Excursion,and Lincoln Navigator don't even compare. Durango will perform, but thats all you can say. The Fords don't come close in power or handling, but do come close with interiors |
[Aug 30, 2000]
Georges Pelpel
Model Reviewed:
Tahoe
Strength:
Ride, engine power, 4 disc breaks, comfort
Weakness:
Gas mileage (but better than competitors), audio systems not as good as in the Grand Cherokee's, old/truck like styling. I am very impressed with the ride quality of the new Tahoe. Similar Products Used: Jeep Grand Cherokee |
[Jun 21, 2000]
Mike Perez
Model Reviewed:
/LT 4WD
Strength:
The ride is extremely comfortable, and space is in abundance. 3 adults can honestly fit in the 2nd row without feeling cramped. The 3rd row seat adds flexibility not available in compact SUVs, but can be easily removed for traditional cargo hauling. Feels very refined for a Chevy product, and it looks damn good.
Weakness:
The sound system is not up to par with the rest of the vehicle. Also, even high end LTs do not come with accessories found in cheaper vehicles (e.g. fender flares, mudflaps, hitch cover). MSRP: Over 40K. Yes, I would highly recommend this vehicle, although some may want to upgrade the weaknesses I charted earlier. Similar Products Used: Nissan Pathfinder: Much more refined and roomy than the leaner PF (which is the reason we purchased it) |
[May 02, 2000]
john
Model Reviewed:
Tahoe
Strength:
Incredibly roomy, great power and great looking.
Weakness:
Unbelievably poor craftmanship with interior door post coverings cracking within 6 months of purchase. The vehicle basically functioned okay until 50,000 miles. I now have 86,000 miles and the following items have malfunctioned since 50,000 miles: air conditioner compressor (50k); water pump (51k); battery cables and posts (52k); fuel sending unit and fuel lines (55k); brake rotors (55k); alternator (75k); brake booster (85k); three different computer chips (65k-85k); intake valve for manifold (85k); and numerous others. The total costs of repairs, not including routine service and maintenance, has been almost $5,000. I paid $28,000 for the vehicle, brand new. This is, without a doubt, the worst vehicle I have ever owned. I serviced the vehicle every 3,000 miles and had all regularly scheduled 7,500 mileage check-ups and service. I am deeply disappointed in the Tahoe. I rarely see any other negative reviews, but I certainly cannot recommend this vehicle. I will never buy another Chevy or GM product. Similar Products Used: I have never owned a truck or SUV. |
[Apr 12, 2000]
Robert
Model Reviewed:
Chevrolet Tahoe LT
Strength:
Good power. Extremely comfortable for 5. Good towing. Great cargo hauler. Good off-road. Great snow/bad weather.
Weakness:
Spongy brakes. Weak Air Conditioning Paid $28,000 new in 1995. We have 125,000 flawless miles consisting of moderate off-road and lots of highway. Been from one coast to the other with 2 adults, 3 kids, luggage, coolers and car seats. Plenty of room and comfort for all. Similar Products Used: None |
[Apr 10, 2000]
Jeff
Model Reviewed:
Tahoe
Strength:
Great family car, Excellent Power (5.3L), handling, comfort/ride.
Weakness:
Spongy Brakes. Excellent Vehicle. Spent about 4 months researching SUV's. Similar Products Used: None |
[Mar 14, 2000]
Leslie
Model Reviewed:
/Tahoe
Strength:
Overall very strong vehicle. Great for family outings on and off road.
Weakness:
Breaking not the best I would strongly recommend this vehicle for the outdoors man due to it rugged build and stability for a price of 30, ooo it was a great by. Similar Products Used: Ford Expedition |
[Feb 22, 2000]
RAY ULBANO
Model Reviewed:
TAHOE
Strength:
Power, Aggressiveness, Large Cargo Space in the Back, Luxurious Ride, Size,
Weakness:
Spongy Brakes, which leads to slow brake response. Obviously Gas Mileage, Constant Tranny Thumps on long trips (When auto-tranny shifts from 1st to 2nd Gear), Loose feeling on the steering. LEASED FOR $34,500.OO . OVERALL, ITS BEEN THERE FOR ME, BUT IM REALLY DISAPPOINTED WITH GM's ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE CONSUMER. SERVICED 2X, WITH NO COOPERATION. NICE TRUCK, FLIMSY CUSTOMER SERVICE. WOULD I BUYOUT THE TRUCK? NAH, I AM TEMPTED TO TRYOUT THE EXPEDITION BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE. Similar Products Used: NONE |
[Feb 10, 2000]
Adam Koch
Model Reviewed:
Tahoe Z71
Strength:
Incredibly smooth and comfortable considering the size and reputation of SUV's. Driving the Tahoe is like driving a Luxury car with a lift.
Weakness:
Not so great gas mileage, rear air is only A/C no heat control for back passengers. We walked on the lot at just the perfect time and were able to take the Z71 off the lot for $3500 less than invoice, I saw it. I'd recommend this to anyone who can afford the gas to drive it, or for pulling a boat and other toys. As far as price goes you can choose between the Trooper, Montero, Explorer, 4Runner, and others all of which are V6. I think the Tahoe is a lot more Auto for the money. Similar Products Used: Isuzu Trooper, the Tahoe is built with more quality in parts as well as structure. It seems much safer and is definetly heavier. |
[Feb 09, 2000]
jay gee
Model Reviewed:
tahoe lt
Strength:
great handling and visibility for large vehicle , especially by a small driver (5'). The best car I've ever owned in all respects. very roomy for family of 5 (3 full grown kids)and dog. can't say enough about visibility from all windows.
Weakness:
only room for 5? rear windows could open more. difficulty in stopping in rain on two occasions, believe due to weight, and momentum. gas mileage, but not surprising for size. vehicle leased, should have purchased it as it is too costly to buy it now. Love it and hate to give it up, especially since subsequent "improvements" especially 2000 redesign have all been negatives in my opinion. 96-99 models are by far the most popular SUV I see. It wasn't broke, why tinker with a winner? New 2000 model such a disappointment, rear side windows useless and new seats cut off any visibility useful for parking, and new look so un-chevy like. Similar Products Used: first truck, so I can't compare rides, but visually, classic good looks beat competition hands down. |