Mercedes-Benz M-Class SUV | Crossover
Mercedes-Benz M-Class SUV | Crossover
|
[Jun 26, 2001]
Mick
Strength:
Provided it works properly -- which is infrequent -- it's pretty fun to drive for a truck.
Weakness:
* Everything previously noted about electrical system seems to be correct. I hope that all that read these reviews take into clear account the numerous 'complaints' of this so-called MBZ product. There appears to be RECURRING electrical problems, to which, we too are afflicted with in our ML430. What we have read in earlier reviews posted here is like looking into a mirror with our 'problem' car too. |
|
[Jul 15, 2001]
Ed O'Rourke
Model Reviewed:
ML320
Strength:
Road handling (especially for an SUV, almost a car like ride)
Weakness:
Broken gizmos. Less than stellar quality control. I have really enjoyed this vehicle overall. I have had a few problems but the overall driving quality compared to other SUVs (and many sedans) and a decent dealer makes up for M-B's less than stellar quality control. The safety features and general design are superb. Seats and driving position are very comfortable. Sound system is good. Never had the vehicle fail to start or strand me but have had it into the shop for annoying problems (tachyometer needle scratched dial, squeek in rear seat, rub in hand brake line, rusted lug nuts, fuel filler cap retaining strap broke, ?front axle wear...still need to get that checked out). Similar Products Used: Jeep Grand Cherokee (complete pile of crap) |
|
[Sep 22, 1999]
J. Glass
Model Reviewed:
ML430
Strength:
Performance, comfort, handling, Skytop roof, load space
Weakness:
cup holders, complicated rear seat folding, cheap sun visors, mileage (1999 Model) - I've owned 3 suv's, including a Trooper and Grand Cherokee, but, overall, the ML430 is the best |
|
[Aug 13, 2001]
Marnie
Model Reviewed:
ML 430
Strength:
Balanced approach, design and engineering, build quality, performance.
Weakness:
Absolutely, positively NONE. This is an awesome vehicle. It delivers exactly as promised. I would say if you are looking for overall flexibility of use and build quality there is no reason on earth to buy ANY other SUV. It strikes the perfect balance between real world ruggedness and a civilized demeanor. It feels perfectly at home in the city, on the highway, on a winding road (caution --it's not a Porsche), over snow in the middle of nowhere, on a stony country field, etc. I have the third row of seats for occasional use --they work wonderfully, although safety would be a concern if a large truck hit you from behind. Absolutely no problems in the first 10,000 miles. This car is in my opinion way superior to all other SUVs, and feels almost as if it was designed and built by a "higher intelligence". I acknowledge that if your ONLY interest is pure ruggedness this may not be the best SUV --it has more of a well rounded, balanced approach, as opposed to good for one thing only. Similar Products Used: Most all other SUVs which I've ridden with friends. |
|
[Aug 13, 2001]
Daniel de Hoyos
Model Reviewed:
ML320
Strength:
*great accelaration, makes nice roaring noise when you STOMP on the pedal. Nice key mechanism. This car captures alot of attention. With the front and back grills, you've got the ULTIMATE Machine. *SPECTACULAR HANDLING. IT COMES WITH a CD CHANGER in the back and with BOSS sound. talk about BUILT IN sound system.
Weakness:
they should have made the interior a lil more innovative. its almost impossible to burn rubber with these beauties. not that very big on the inside. my dad gave me this car for when i started College. DAMN DOES THIS CAR capture attention. If your those guys that like to pick up chicks all the time. Trust me, with this beauty you'll be overflowed with them. Everytime i'd drive this car anywhere, people would stare. And ask if it was my dad's car. I'd say "no" its 100 percent mine. Shoot, i sure have my fun with it. As an added plus, i added the front grills and the back grills, and the side steps that came out to like almost $2000. The color of my car is grey, and thats probably the best color that fits it. I've seen other colors, but they dont look as stylish as the gray one does. Forget the Escalade and forget the Denali. This SHOULD BE YOUR CHOICE. remember CADILLAC is only considered luxiorious in the U.S. imagine that?? and what about GMC....HAHAHA, trying to make there SUV look like its all that. GIVE ME A BREAK. MERCEDES IS KNOWN worldwide, and MERCEDES is class, quality and the number one choice if you want THE BEST. Similar Products Used: although to me personally the CADILLAC ESCALADE and the YUKON DENALI design was more appealing than the Mercedes ML320, Mercedes is stil my choice. if you have any questions about this car, feel free to email me. |
|
[Jul 20, 2001]
adam mateyko
Model Reviewed:
ml320
Strength:
highway ride and handling
Weakness:
poor quality radio and plastics trim Overall, it is not up to MB quality standards, thought recently these have fallen also. The basic car is built well, but the assembly and the parts espectially in the car body are very poor quality. Obviously MB saved a lot of money on the interior, radio, dash, hvac, etc. Similar Products Used: many bmw and mb cars, toyota landcruiser |
|
[Jul 28, 2001]
Susan
Model Reviewed:
ML 320
Strength:
Saftey. Beautiful SUV inside and out. Ride is smooth.
Weakness:
The back door is sooooo heavy. Impression. I am blowed away by this veichle! I love it. I bought it used and it was like buying it new. I traded my 88 Cady Deville with only 61,000. miles on it.That was hard to do. But the ride of the ML is very smooth and enjoyable. My husband who has a Navi is very impressed with it. Lots of room for me and the 2 kids. Sound system is great. I do not think I could be any happier with anything else. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jul 28, 2001]
Dick White
Model Reviewed:
ML320
Strength:
Drives nicely and has reasonable gas mileage
Weakness:
Rapid wear of brakes(despite relativley gentle driving) Generally, I have had a reasonably satisfactory experience with this vehicle. The quality, however, is subpar in terms of the supposed MBZ tradition. The interior, despite the woodgrain accents and certain Mercedes-resque features, is even more austere than the 190 which I owned at one time. I also agree with previous reviews on this forum that this product has been underengineered. It has many little flaws that obviously were teething problems exacerbated by an apparent rush of the product into the market place. I have had a bad experience with brake wear and am wondering if this is a generic problem. The last replacement of the front pads was only after just over 10 months and 15,000km(approximately 10,000miles). The dealer told me to write MBZ so I would reserve judgement until(and if) they reply to see what their explanations could be.(Probably tell me it's my driving habit...even most of my driving has been on freeway and I would rate my driving personally as being "gentle"). Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jul 25, 2001]
Gregory
Model Reviewed:
55 / 600
Strength:
Unique styling, everything!
Weakness:
nada i was at my local driving range and i saw a 600. itwas truely beautiful. the styling on that truck was so unique. makes me want to get rid o my 55 for one. i cant wait to track one down and test drive it. Similar Products Used: LR Discovery II SE7, LR Defender 90 & 110, LR Range Rover HSE, MB S 600, MB E 55, Saab 95 Aero, BMW X5, Jag S - Type, Lexus SC 430, Lexus LS 430, AMG Hummer, Lam Diablo, Ferrari Spyder...just to name a few... |
|
[Jul 25, 2001]
Karl
Model Reviewed:
Mercedes-Benz ML-320
Strength:
Comfortable ride, predictable handling, smooth drive train. Flexible service - oil change and routine service every 10K or so.
Weakness:
Electrical, trim, dealer service. Repeated problems with same parts suggests several design flaws. Dreadful experience. Frequent and repeated problems with door locks, remote lock/unlock, alarm, and electrical system. Replaced entire instrument panel. In shop more than a dozen times for warranty repairs in 21 months. Often dealer(s) did not properly make repair the first time necessitating repeated visits and prolonged periods with loaner car. The only thing I'm confident about this vehicle is that there will be another problem soon! I don't have the time to continue dealing with it, but waited too long to take advantage of lemon laws. Sold it back to a dealer, who was supported by MBUSA, who paid a bit less than blue book retail. An expensive lesson - don't get to like your car too much! Recommend looking at Lexus or BMW competitors. Similar Products Used: Recommend looking at Lexus or BMW competitors that are likely to be more reliable. |


